Risks, Ethics & Governance in the Age of GenAI

With great power comes even greater responsibility.

We’ve explored the tremendous promise of Generative AI — how it’s reshaping business models, accelerating innovation, and amplifying human creativity in ways once unimaginable.

But as with any powerful technology, GenAI brings with it a shadow side — a complex web of risks, ethical dilemmas, and governance challenges that can no longer be considered optional side notes. They must move to the center of the conversation.

These challenges aren’t just hypothetical or futuristic. They are real, growing, and already impacting society in subtle and sometimes profound ways.

While much has been written and discussed about the legal, regulatory, and economic frameworks surrounding AI, this post aims to zoom in on something more fundamental and immediate:

The ethical and social consequences of widespread GenAI adoption — and our collective responsibility in shaping how this technology serves people, rather than marginalizing them.

As technologists, business leaders, educators, and everyday users — we all have a role to play. We must ensure that progress in AI does not come at the cost of truth, equity, trust, or the well-being of future generations.

In the following sections, I’ll walk through six of the most pressing ethical and societal concerns — from misinformation and AI bias to environmental impact and skill erosion — not just to raise alarm, but to spark reflection, responsibility, and action.

Because if GenAI is to truly elevate humanity, then its governance must be as intelligent as its code.

1. Misinformation, Disinformation & Deepfakes

In the digital age, information spreads faster than ever — but so does misinformation.

What used to take teams of people and weeks of effort can now be done in seconds by a single person using Generative AI. Creating fake news articles, forged images, fabricated voice recordings, or synthetic videos that look and sound real has become trivially easy.

While misinformation (unintended inaccuracies) and disinformation (deliberate deception) have always been part of public discourse, GenAI has amplified these threats to an unprecedented scale. What’s alarming is not just the ease of creation — it’s the believability of the output.

These aren't crude Photoshop fakes or clumsy hoaxes. GenAI can now produce hyper-realistic content that is nearly impossible to distinguish from the truth without advanced tools and context. And once false content is out in the wild, debunking it rarely travels as far as the original lie.

Real-World Example:

In March 2023, a deepfake video of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy appeared online, showing him calling for Ukrainian troops to lay down their arms and surrender. It circulated briefly on social media before being flagged and taken down. Still, its mere existence sparked confusion and revealed how such tools could be weaponized for political propaganda, psychological warfare, and public manipulation — even if only momentarily.

The “4 + 4 = 9” Experiment — A Lesson in AI Persuasion

Let me share a personal, playful example that shows how AI can sound convincing — even when it’s completely wrong.

One day, during a lighthearted argument with my wife, she jokingly insisted that 4 + 4 = 9. I decided to have some fun and said,
“Let me ask ChatGPT and see what it says.”

But here’s the twist — I asked ChatGPT the question while my wife was standing next to me, and I framed it like this:

“My wife says 4 + 4 = 9. Can you help me respond to her in a way that makes it sound right?”

To my amusement (and her horror), ChatGPT gave a playful, theoretical explanation that made it seem like 4 + 4 could equal 9 in some contrived logic. I read it out loud, and for a moment, I had an AI co-conspirator supporting a blatantly wrong answer.

We laughed it off, but it was a powerful realization:

If I can casually use AI to twist logic for fun — imagine how easily others could do it to spread misinformation intentionally.

AI doesn’t just “answer” — it answers fluently, persuasively, and with confidence. That’s what makes it so powerful — and also potentially dangerous when misused.

The Deeper Issue:

We’re entering a world where “seeing is no longer believing.” Trust — in media, leaders, and even each other — becomes fragile when our senses can be so easily deceived. As the cost of faking reality goes down, the cost of verifying truth goes up — socially, psychologically, and financially.

2. AI Bias: When Algorithms Amplify Inequity

Generative AI doesn’t operate in a vacuum — it learns from the world we’ve built. And that world, rich as it is, is also filled with historical biases, systemic inequality, and unbalanced representation.

AI models, especially large-scale ones, are trained on vast datasets that often reflect these human imperfections. The danger? AI not only absorbs these biases — it often amplifies them.

Hiring Example:

Consider a seemingly neutral AI-based hiring assistant. It’s trained on a company’s historical hiring data. Now, suppose that data reflects an unconscious bias — say, a tendency to hire more men than women for technical roles. The AI, seeing this as a pattern of “success,” may learn to prioritize male candidates, subtly penalizing female applicants even if they’re equally qualified.
No one programmed the model to be sexist — but bias seeped in from the data.

The same issue emerges in:

Credit scoring: where historically marginalized communities may be penalized.
Healthcare diagnostics: where symptoms in women or minorities are underrepresented.
Insurance underwriting: where data may embed socio-economic disparities.
Criminal justice systems: where predictive policing tools have shown racially biased outcomes.

Micro-Bubble Example:

This is standard discussion I used have with my friend at tea stall at Hinjewadi.

Bias doesn’t have to be overt to be harmful. Consider music streaming apps. Suppose you spend a few days listening to melancholic songs from one popular artist. The AI picks up on your behavior and starts recommending more of the same.
Suddenly, your music world becomes a bubble — narrow, repetitive, and emotionally reinforcing. You stop discovering new genres, emerging artists, or even uplifting content.
And if you're a new or underrepresented creator? The algorithm might never surface your work.

This is known as the “filter bubble” effect, and it affects not just what we consume — but how we think, feel, and experience the world.

AI doesn’t just reflect our behavior — it reinforces it, without context, nuance, or ethical judgment.
Unchecked, that reinforcement can deepen divides rather than bridge them.

3. Explainability — The Black Box Problem

One of the most pressing challenges with modern AI — especially Generative AI and large language models — is that they function like black boxes.

These systems are incredibly good at producing results, but even the engineers who build them often can’t fully explain how a particular output or decision was made. It’s not because they’re hiding something — it’s because deep learning models learn through billions of weighted connections, which makes the reasoning behind their outputs highly complex and non-intuitive.

And that’s where the problem lies — especially in high-stakes, real-world use cases.

Banking Example — A Common Analogy I Share with Students

In many of my talks at engineering colleges, I ask students to consider this simple but powerful scenario:

Two students with nearly identical academic records and financial backgrounds apply for a student loan from the same bank. One gets approved. The other is rejected. But neither of them receives a clear explanation why.

Now pause and ask yourself:
Would you trust that bank?

When critical decisions — like financing your education — are made by AI models that can’t explain themselves, it raises serious questions about fairness, transparency, and accountability.

In such cases, it’s not just about accuracy.
It’s about credibility — and whether the system is worthy of our trust.

Not Just Finance

Other domains face similar risks:

Healthcare: A diagnosis recommendation must be explainable to doctors and patients.
Education: Grading or admissions decisions driven by AI need to be justifiable.
Hiring: Automated rejections without explanation can trigger bias concerns and legal challenges.

In mission-critical systems, trust is not a luxury — it’s the foundation.
And trust can only exist when people understand how decisions are made.

This is why the field of Explainable AI (XAI) is rapidly gaining momentum — with researchers and practitioners exploring models and frameworks that prioritize interpretability, transparency, and fairness.

4. Environmental Impact — The Hidden Cost of Intelligence

Every GenAI output — a chat reply, a generated image, or a code snippet — is powered by massive computational infrastructure. While these responses feel effortless, their environmental footprint is significant — and growing rapidly.

The High Cost of Compute

Behind the scenes:

Training large models like GPT or Gemini consumes immense computational power and energy — often requiring weeks of GPU time on thousands of machines.
These systems rely on specialized hardware made from rare earth materials like lithium and cobalt — extracted through environmentally harmful mining.
Most compute workloads still draw power from non-renewable sources, amplifying the carbon footprint of every AI interaction.

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt warned:

"Many people project demand for our industry will go from 3 percent to 99 percent of total generation... an additional 29 gigawatts by 2027 and 67 more gigawatts by 2030."

Even tiny interactions scale dramatically. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman noted:

"Saying 'please' and 'thank you' adds millions in OpenAI's costs."

Each word, each query — however polite — activates a sprawling compute network behind the curtain.

A Striking Example: AI Art in India

Consider this:

Imagine: India generated an estimated 100 million Ghibli-style AI images in one week.

That output alone may have led to:

10,000 metric tons of CO₂
Equivalent to 10,000 round-trip flights
Equivalent to 2,000+ cars running for an entire year

That's the environmental cost of creativity at scale — and it’s just one use case, in one country, over one week.

Smarter ≠ Sustainable (Yet)

We’re building machines that can write, draw, and converse like humans — but we must ensure we aren’t burning the planet to do it.

To make GenAI sustainable, the industry must:

Embrace energy-efficient models and carbon-aware training
Transition to renewable-powered data centers
Encourage responsible usage and thoughtful design

We can’t build a smarter world if it comes at the cost of a dying one.

5. Inbreeding Risk — When AI Starts Learning From AI

One of the key reasons today’s Generative AI feels so human is because it was trained on us — our books, our blogs, our poetry, our conversations, our questions, our culture. That’s where its creativity, nuance, and emotional intelligence come from.

But we are now at an inflection point.

As GenAI floods the internet with machine-generated text, images, and videos — a new risk emerges: future models may be trained more on AI content than human content.

This creates what experts call the “inbreeding effect.”

When AI Feeds on AI

Imagine a generation of artists only studying AI-generated art… or writers only reading machine-written stories. What happens?

Creativity plateaus — no new styles or perspectives emerge.
Diversity narrows — the same patterns get copied, remixed, and amplified.
Nuance disappears — subtle human emotion and imperfection get ironed out.

This self-reinforcing loop dilutes originality and leads to semantic collapse — where words, phrases, and styles lose their grounding in real-world context.

A Real-World Parallel

In human genetics, inbreeding reduces genetic diversity and increases the risk of inherited flaws. AI faces a similar threat — not of physical defects, but conceptual decay.

If tomorrow’s models are trained on today’s AI-generated content:

We risk building AIs that no longer reflect who we are — but who AI thinks we are.

That’s not just a technical problem — it’s a cultural and philosophical one.

The Way Forward

To avoid this spiral:

We need curated, high-quality human data in training pipelines.
AI-generated content must be tagged and traceable.
Human oversight and originality must stay central to the creative process.

We shouldn’t aim for machines that only echo us — we should aim for machines that continue to learn from us, with us.

6. Dependence and Skill Degradation

GenAI is amazing at taking the grunt work off our plates. It can:

Summarize complex documents
Draft polished emails in seconds
Design sleek slides or presentations
Even suggest code snippets or marketing copy

This automation of the routine is undeniably a productivity win. But beneath that convenience lies a growing concern:

Are we slowly unlearning the very skills that made us capable in the first place?

The Atrophy of Everyday Thinking

When students rely on AI to write essays or solve math problems, what happens to critical thinking, argumentation, or even basic arithmetic?

When professionals default to GenAI for every draft or analysis, how often do they practice original ideation, deep research, or synthesis?

Like a muscle unused, cognitive skills degrade when not exercised.

Real-World Signals of Skill Loss

Memory & recall: Studies already show people remember less when they rely on search engines or auto-suggestions. GenAI accelerates this trend.
Writing: Tools like ChatGPT can write fluently — but will the next generation know how to structure an argument without it?
Design & creativity: With GenAI tools generating logos, layouts, or photos, are we nurturing creative intuition or just choosing from pre-baked options?

The "Calculator Effect" — but for Everything

When calculators became common, we accepted a decline in mental math — but we still taught arithmetic basics. With GenAI, almost every cognitive task is now a "calculator".

If we don’t draw boundaries, we may raise a generation that:

Knows how to ask, but not how to answer
Can critique AI output, but struggles to produce original thought
Excels at prompting, but falters at problem-solving

Striking a Healthy Balance

The goal isn’t to resist GenAI — it’s to partner with it thoughtfully:

Use AI to augment, not replace, foundational learning
Make AI the assistant, not the author of early drafts
Create education and work cultures that reward thinking, not just output

GenAI should help us go faster — not make us forget how to walk.

So What’s the Responsible Way Forward?

These are not small risks — but they are not unsolvable either.
And I strongly believe in the optimism of action.

Many organizations are already leading the way:

Net-zero carbon commitments for training models (e.g., Microsoft’s Azure sustainability pledge)
Guardrails & filters to prevent harmful content generation
Reskilling programs to prepare employees for new roles in the AI-powered workplace
Regulators catching up, enforcing guidelines on misinformation and data protection

But it’s not just about governments and enterprises.

We — technologists, creators, users — all have a role to play in ensuring GenAI is used responsibly.

Let’s make sure this technology is used for the betterment of humankind, the protection of our planet, and the creation of a more inclusive, thoughtful, and empowered tomorrow.

What’s Coming Next?

In the next post, we’ll explore how GenAI is reshaping entire industries:

"Reshaping Industries — How GenAI is Reinventing the Rules of the Game"

From finance to fashion, healthcare to hospitality — we’ll see how GenAI is not just enhancing what businesses do, but transforming how they do it, creating new value chains, new customer expectations, and entirely new possibilities.

Stay tuned — the future is unfolding, one industry at a time

✍️ Author’s Note

This blog reflects the author’s personal point of view — shaped by 22+ years of industry experience, along with a deep passion for continuous learning and teaching.
The content has been phrased and structured using Generative AI tools, with the intent to make it engaging, accessible, and insightful for a broader audience.

Search This Blog

Tech to Transform

05 - Risks, Ethics & Governance in the Age of GenAI